<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Landmines on The Algo Bench</title><link>https://thealgobench.com/landmines/</link><description>Recent content in Landmines on The Algo Bench</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-IN</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thealgobench.com/landmines/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Survivorship bias</title><link>https://thealgobench.com/landmines/survivorship-bias/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thealgobench.com/landmines/survivorship-bias/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-trap"&gt;The trap&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;You want to test a stock strategy on the NIFTY 500, so you download the list of NIFTY 500 stocks and run your rules over&#10;the last ten years. The problem is that the list you downloaded is &lt;strong&gt;today&amp;rsquo;s&lt;/strong&gt; list. It contains only the companies that&#10;are still big and still listed. Every company that collapsed, was delisted, merged away or simply shrank out of the index&#10;along the way has disappeared from your test.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trading the untradable index</title><link>https://thealgobench.com/landmines/trading-the-untradable/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thealgobench.com/landmines/trading-the-untradable/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-trap"&gt;The trap&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The NIFTY 50 index is a calculated number, not something you can trade. When a backtest buys and sells &amp;ldquo;NIFTY&amp;rdquo; at the&#10;index&amp;rsquo;s own 1-min or 5-min high, low and close, it assumes fills at prices that may never have existed on any tradeable&#10;instrument. Real trades happen in futures, options or a &lt;strong&gt;synthetic future&lt;/strong&gt; (a long call plus a short put at the same&#10;strike, which behaves like a future).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Wrong costs, in either direction</title><link>https://thealgobench.com/landmines/what-a-strangle-really-costs/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thealgobench.com/landmines/what-a-strangle-really-costs/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-trap"&gt;The trap&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Using a rule-of-thumb cost per trade (&amp;ldquo;call it 2 points a leg, each way&amp;rdquo;) instead of a cost model built up from the actual&#10;charges and checked against real fills.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="how-it-fools-you"&gt;How it fools you&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The error can run either way, and both directions are expensive:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>